<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big company simplicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/big-company-simplicity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/big-company-simplicity</link>
	<description>Adam DuVander’s thoughts on keeping things simple.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; Why big companies don&#38;#8217;t keep things simple</title>
		<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/big-company-simplicity/comment-page-1#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; Why big companies don&#38;#8217;t keep things simple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/big-company-simplicity#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>[...] A pretty basic assumption of this site is that keeping things simple is better for you and better for your customers or users. As part of that assumption, I think companies that focus on simplicity will be most successful (though they need to do it well). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A pretty basic assumption of this site is that keeping things simple is better for you and better for your customers or users. As part of that assumption, I think companies that focus on simplicity will be most successful (though they need to do it well). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

