<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simpler for whom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom</link>
	<description>Adam DuVander’s thoughts on keeping things simple.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; The Art of the Special Case</title>
		<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom/comment-page-1#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; The Art of the Special Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom#comment-960</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not sure it is always so obvious when to make the special case. There is unlikely to be any formula to help you decide. One of the troubles is that a special case involves a trade-off of whether you&#8217;re making things easier on you, or easier on your user. The art is deciding when each is the best choice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#38;#8217;m not sure it is always so obvious when to make the special case. There is unlikely to be any formula to help you decide. One of the troubles is that a special case involves a trade-off of whether you&#38;#8217;re making things easier on you, or easier on your user. The art is deciding when each is the best choice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; One key to rule them all</title>
		<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom/comment-page-1#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; One key to rule them all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom#comment-959</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t know how easy it was for the locksmith, but it&#8217;s incredibly simple for me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#38;#8217;t know how easy it was for the locksmith, but it&#38;#8217;s incredibly simple for me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; Stop thinking like a technician</title>
		<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom/comment-page-1#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; Stop thinking like a technician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom#comment-958</guid>
		<description>[...] I actively try not to think like a technician. I try to remove from my brain the knowledge of how web sites and applications are made. When I jump too quickly from problem to technical solution, I am grasping at what is easiest to implement, not what would be best for the user. Sometimes I have to ask, simpler for whom? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I actively try not to think like a technician. I try to remove from my brain the knowledge of how web sites and applications are made. When I jump too quickly from problem to technical solution, I am grasping at what is easiest to implement, not what would be best for the user. Sometimes I have to ask, simpler for whom? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; Surfing without Javascript</title>
		<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom/comment-page-1#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Simplicity Rules &#38;#187; Surfing without Javascript</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/simpler-for-whom#comment-957</guid>
		<description>[...] That sounds not simple for the developer. Yet, this is a time to ask, simpler for whom? Because when done right, like the GMaps team has, the solution is very elegant for all users. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That sounds not simple for the developer. Yet, this is a time to ask, simpler for whom? Because when done right, like the GMaps team has, the solution is very elegant for all users. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

