<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The end of social networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/the-end-of-social-networks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/the-end-of-social-networks</link>
	<description>Adam DuVander’s thoughts on keeping things simple.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thilak</title>
		<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/the-end-of-social-networks/comment-page-1#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamduvander.com/simple/the-end-of-social-networks#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Well, I hate those Social Networking site like Orkut or MySpace, but sometimes I do get traffic from those sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I hate those Social Networking site like Orkut or MySpace, but sometimes I do get traffic from those sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/the-end-of-social-networks/comment-page-1#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamduvander.com/simple/the-end-of-social-networks#comment-465</guid>
		<description>I agree that a minority of users contribute in most social sites. I saw Mike&#039;s talk and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rashmisinha.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rashmi Sinha&lt;/a&gt; had a similar point in her session.

Not only does having another purpose to a site give members more reason to use it, but I think it also greatly enhances the experience of those who take advantage of the social features.

As for MySpace disappearing, I also doubt it. The part of Markus&#039; point I agree with is that there are a limited amount of sites that can just be social networks. Right now MySpace is the top dog. Friendster was the place to be a few years ago, so who knows how secure that top spot is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that a minority of users contribute in most social sites. I saw Mike&#8217;s talk and <a href="http://www.rashmisinha.com/" rel="nofollow">Rashmi Sinha</a> had a similar point in her session.</p>
<p>Not only does having another purpose to a site give members more reason to use it, but I think it also greatly enhances the experience of those who take advantage of the social features.</p>
<p>As for MySpace disappearing, I also doubt it. The part of Markus&#8217; point I agree with is that there are a limited amount of sites that can just be social networks. Right now MySpace is the top dog. Friendster was the place to be a few years ago, so who knows how secure that top spot is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/the-end-of-social-networks/comment-page-1#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamduvander.com/simple/the-end-of-social-networks#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know if you were there or not, but Mike Davidson touched on this at webvisions as well. Basically, only about 1% are going to actually contribute to the social aspect of things, so make sure you have a good thing going even without the social networking--that should just be an added bonus. It&#039;s an interesting point, and a valid one, I believe.

MySpace is very much a fad, and will likely lose most of its popularity sometime in the near future. To say it will disappear entirely, though, I think is a bit much. And it&#039;s done what it meant to do, hasn&#039;t it? Made tons of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if you were there or not, but Mike Davidson touched on this at webvisions as well. Basically, only about 1% are going to actually contribute to the social aspect of things, so make sure you have a good thing going even without the social networking&#8211;that should just be an added bonus. It&#8217;s an interesting point, and a valid one, I believe.</p>
<p>MySpace is very much a fad, and will likely lose most of its popularity sometime in the near future. To say it will disappear entirely, though, I think is a bit much. And it&#8217;s done what it meant to do, hasn&#8217;t it? Made tons of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

